The interesting difference between ASCII and Unicode is that the first had only one group of digits defined (30h to 39h), and the latter defines 42 decimal digit groups (I think it actually defines more, but nvm). A common programming language operation is to convert a sequence of digit-characters (yes, a number) to a machine-understandable integer. Does any default in-language string-to-integer support Unicode digits? Does any is-digit function return true on Unicode digits? Well, I did some checking and created a table (programming language/version/library vs digit group) that addresses these questions.
Post dostępny jedynie po angielsko-języcznej stronie lustra.
Sections
- lang:
| 
- RSS: |
- About me
- Tools
- → YT YouTube (EN)
- → D Discord
- → M Mastodon
- → T Twitter
- → GH GitHub
Links / Blogs
- → dragonsector.pl
- → vexillium.org
- Security/Hacking:
- Reverse Eng./Low-Level:
- Programming/Code:
Posts
- xz/liblzma: Bash-stage Obfuscation Explained,
- Two of my bookmarklets: image extraction and simple TTS,
- Paged Out! #3 is out,
- My howto script,
- Talk: PCI Express to Hell,
- Live: On Leaving Google and What's Next,
- Thoughts on overlarge fields in formats and protocols,
- On self-healing code and the obvious issue,
- LLM + Clean Room: Will LLMs be the death of code copyrights?,
- Solving a VM-based CTF challenge without solving it properly,
- → see all posts on main page
Add a comment: